Lucia Foderà
Fabio Maniscalco
in una libera interpretazione artistica
a cura di Network Museum
fonte: Archivio Network Museum
proprietà intellettuale INFOGESTIONE s.a.s.
fonte: Archivio Network Museum
proprietà intellettuale INFOGESTIONE s.a.s.

Lucia Foderà – Archaeology is a science that reconstructs the past, not solely through books but directly in the field, within everyday reality. The stratigraphic archaeologist is like a farmer of history.
History consists of countless fragments from the past; I like to call them, somewhat improperly, “pieces of memory.” The archaeologist’s task is precisely to reassemble those fragments, customs, traditions, architecture, and ways of life. However, not everything is linked to material aspects. Often, archaeologists must reconstruct the thoughts, emotions, and passions of people from the past.
Naval archaeology aims to do the same. Underwater excavation is a true stratigraphic excavation, equivalent to terrestrial archaeology. Naval archaeologists study ancient shipwrecks, their architecture, their armament, and their cargo to reconstruct ancient trade networks and civilizations.
In this field, we are not solely concerned with material culture, we must also reconstruct, above all, life on board. Naval archaeology interacts with traditional archaeology, paleobotany, anthropology, and numerous other disciplines.
However, underwater archaeology, as a specialized discipline, risks becoming dangerously self-referential and isolated. Many times, I hear people say that archaeology is useless, only concerned with aspects of a distant past, but it is crucial to teach new generations that without a deep understanding of the past, we cannot build the future.

Sebastiano Tusa
in una libera interpretazione artistica
a cura di Network Museum
Sito del DRASSM
fonte: https://www.culture.gouv.fr/
fonte: Archivio Network Museum
proprietà intellettuale INFOGESTIONE s.a.s.
fonte: Archivio Network Museum
proprietà intellettuale INFOGESTIONE s.a.s.
fonte: Archivio Network Museum
proprietà intellettuale INFOGESTIONE s.a.s.

Lucia Foderà – As an inspector of national and international naval museums, a role I held in 2024, I can compare what happens in Italy’s cultural institutions with what occurs abroad. Italy is the country with the richest cultural heritage in the world, yet it does not guarantee its accessibility. We must invest in culture, as other countries do, where the educational system is completely innovative, focused on the use of new technologies to enhance knowledge.
Why do we always view foreign models as something perfect but unattainable within our own reality? Why does the Vasa Museum in Stockholm have an entire area dedicated to public communication within its exhibition spaces? Why are Italy’s cultural institutions still embedded in an academic rigidity that leads nowhere?
The issue is not just the crisis, as archaeologist and art historian Salvatore Settis pointed out some years ago, we need to change the way we approach culture, transmit culture, and enhance culture.
There is a great difference in educational methods and, so to speak, visitor engagement between Italian and foreign museums. At the Vasa Museum, children have entirely dedicated spaces, where they can play, draw, and experiment with new things. In Italy, this rarely happens, except for the Galata Museum in Genoa and the Museum of Ancient Ships in Pisa, which offer classrooms entirely dedicated to education.
All of this should make us deeply reflect. We must abandon the static nature, inaccessibility, and lack of communication that characterize Italy’s cultural institutions. We need to open them to the community, to its needs, and create museum structures and exhibitions “in fieri”—constantly evolving, just as time flows inevitably through our lives every day.


Ricostruzione virtuale di attività di rilevazione con georadar
fonte: Archivio Network Museum
proprietà intellettuale INFOGESTIONE s.a.s.

Lucia Foderà – Archaeology is crucial for the responsible management of territory. Preventive archaeology can be considered a fully modern discipline, “in fieri.” Archaeology, urban planning, and landscape planning are pieces of a single mosaic, as seen abroad, whereas in Italy, an unjustified distinction is still made between them.
It is always necessary to protect and enhance the cultural background of a given location where future operations are planned. Working in synergy with multiple professionals in the field is essential: on a construction site, teamwork is key, fostering deep dialogue among various specialists, ensuring that nothing is overlooked.
Thus, we often see engineers conversing with architects, who in turn engage with planners, who collaborate with archaeologists, who interact with agronomists, all critical links in a single assembly chain.
A great asset in the third millennium is technology, which enables all involved professionals to work with more complete and detailed data. The use of artificial intelligence, georadar, and GIS tools is crucial in this sector for more informed territorial management.

Salvatore Settis
in una libera interpretazione artistica
a cura di Network Museum

Lucia Foderà – If our past were destroyed, if “insignificant ruins” were replaced by shopping malls and football stadiums, our cultural identity would be erased forever, and we would become increasingly victims of extreme globalization. We must safeguard memory to build the future.
Often, the figure of the archaeologist is detached from their own time and era, seen as an obstacle to progress, innovation, and modernity. In reality, archaeologists embrace progress with confidence, archaeology increasingly relies on new technologies to better understand artifacts, structures, and traces of the past.
However, we must not confuse progress with destruction. Unfortunately, political institutions do little to stop the indiscriminate usurpation and degradation of our cultural heritage.
Salvatore Settis, a distinguished archaeologist, once remarked that forgetting culture and heritage is a long-standing tradition in Italian politics, across all parties and ideologies.
From the recently withdrawn DL Culture amendment, which proposed making the opinion of the Superintendencies non-binding, to the infamous comment whispered by a former Prime Minister to a Minister of Culture during the G20 on Culture, “Do not listen too much to the experts (archaeologists), otherwise nothing gets done”, these examples reveal just how fragile our cultural identity remains.

Domus Aurea – Progetto Katatexilux
fonte: https://www.katatexilux.com/domus-aurea

Lucia Foderà – The relationship between archaeology and technological progress is becoming increasingly close, necessary, and instrumental. Archaeology relies on the tools provided by new technologies to expand its “range” of knowledge about the past. Numerous advancements and remarkable projects have been developed to meet these specific needs.
Artificial intelligence, augmented reality, virtual reality, drones, and specialized software have significantly enhanced the preservation and promotion of our cultural heritage.
One example is the “Katatexilux” project, which focuses on digital reconstructions and models, including the virtual reconstruction of Nero’s Domus Aurea.
I firmly believe in the synergy between archaeology and technology, which is why I decided to found, alongside a team of skilled professionals in cultural heritage, the new multimedia and innovative headquarters of ArcheoClub d’Italia in Rome.
This new space is designed to be modern, inclusive, and accessible to a broad audience, breaking away from academic rigidity and compartmentalized thinking.
It will also be Italy’s first headquarters primarily dedicated to naval archaeology, promoting a freer and more inclusive approach to culture.

Lucia Foderà – I envision a research approach where the fundamental, distinctive, and traditional elements of archaeology will be replaced. First and foremost, archaeological excavation will no longer be an indispensable research tool. Instead, remote sensing and georadar will allow us to see what lies beneath the ground. Laser scanning and LiDAR will become increasingly important.
All of this will enable the collection of more reliable data, saving time, human resources, and money. Everything will change—the role and methodological approach of the archaeologist will evolve, with fieldwork gradually giving way to laboratory-based material analysis.
However, it is crucial to remember one fundamental truth: new technological tools can never replace the skills, expertise, and cultural knowledge of the professional.

Genova: Museo Galata
libera interpretazione artistica a cura di Network Museum

Lucia Foderà – A smart museum is one that can interpret and develop the paradigms of modernity in the era of digital transformation. Museums of the future must be accessible, digital, narrated, sustainable, and lived. Ensuring accessibility to the museum, in all its forms, is considered an unquestionable indicator of social justice and the well-being owed to citizens. To extend the concept of accessibility and inclusion to that of participation—and to recognize the museum as a living element of its territory—one of the first steps is to contextualize it within its community. That means bringing the museum outside of itself and connecting it to the external reality: its cultural, historical, productive, associative, and touristic components, its communication systems, and its gathering places. This is where new roles emerge: the digital strategy manager and the museum communicator. We must keep pace with the times and understand the needs of the public—a public that is increasingly diverse, with varying expectations, navigating exhibition spaces within a constitutional framework that is “in fieri.” A museum that, as G. H. Rivière once said, “is constantly changing.”
During my experience as a museum inspector, I often asked myself: Are contemporary naval museums truly inclusive? Can their cultural experience be enjoyed by everyone? I’m not just referring to their internal dimension—the removal of cognitive barriers or the design of accessible and usable exhibits—but also to their external dimension. Museums today must become part of a broader, more complex whole: a society in constant transformation, marked by both potential and fragility, often characterized by fragmented communities.
In its latest definition of “museum” (2022), ICOM introduced two fundamental words: “participation” and “community,” thus emphasizing the ethical role that museums are called to assume in relation to society—making the enjoyment of their collections not only the goal of their mission, but also the means through which they contribute to societal development.
One of the weaknesses of the Italian cultural system is its outdated infrastructure. From the scarcity of Braille captions (only one-fifth of museums offer tactile paths or panels for the visually impaired) to closures due to neglect, there are many ways in which access to museums and cultural sites is not guaranteed. Historic museum buildings should enhance the value of their collections—not become a barrier.
It is unacceptable that a major museum like the one in Nemi faces serious structural issues, with exhibits frozen in 1988, captions made of faded and torn sheets placed randomly, staff unwilling to engage with the public, and a lack of essential services such as gift/bookshops or refreshment areas. Green spaces are neglected, everything is left to decay, and the museum itself has become a wreck.
We must break free from our self-referential system and look abroad, engaging with colleagues from other maritime museums to explore new forms of practice.
Some elements, especially in Northern Europe, are particularly relevant. First and foremost, the relationship with real ships. Maritime museums are built near water. Ships enter directly into the museum, or the museum is built around the ship (like the Vasa at the Vasamuseet in Stockholm). In Italy, exhibition spaces are often adapted; rarely is a structure built specifically for a museum collection. This limits the ability to create expansive, flexible scenographies that would be impossible within historic buildings.
Why do we always view foreign models as perfect but unrepeatable in our own reality? Why does the Vasa Museum in Stockholm have a dedicated area for public communication within its galleries? Why are Italian cultural institutions still entrenched in academic rigidity that leads nowhere?
We must change the way we approach culture. There is a significant difference in educational methods and, so to speak, in the ability to attract visitors between Italian and foreign museums. At the Vasa Museum, children have entire spaces dedicated to them—places to play, draw, and experiment. In Italy, this almost never happens, except at the Galata Museum in Genoa or the Museum of Ancient Ships in Pisa, which offer classrooms entirely dedicated to education.

All of this should deeply make us reflect.

© Copyright Infogestione

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *